![]() Of course, Xyp9x's performance relative to his role's limitations may be more impressive, but is it more important? Remember the definition of "best" given: the player who contributes most to winning tournaments. ![]() In fact, his role itself is not merely a constant pressure - it's also a pedestal. Helena Kristiansson/ESLĪnd yet, there's more to dev1ce's performance than his statistics and the burden of his role. Andreas "Xyp9x" Højsleth and Astralis came in as favorites to lift the ESL Pro League Season 8 trophy. As a consequence of this added cost, dev1ce is expected to have a significantly bigger impact on the game than he would with the AK. With an awp rather than an AK, $6,350 more was sacrificed to get that one kill. If someone gets only a single kill in three purchases of an AK-47, it is much less costly for the team than it would be if the exact same stat line was with an awp instead. Since dev1ce is a dedicated awper, his team will purchase something that has massive economic repercussions for him. The economy is an example of one such sacrifice. For dev1ce's performance to be considered average, it must be significantly more impressive than Xyp9x's as a consequence of the sacrifices his team makes to set him up for success. Specifically, roles force us to take into consideration the burden of expectation that should be placed on each player. If roles bring out a flaw in statistical measures, it blurs other measures of the "best" player. So if we want to prove that dev1ce is the better player, statistics won't do the trick. So if Xyp9x and dev1ce both had an 85 ADR, it is quite likely that Xyp9x was the better performer of the two, as his kills were likely to come from clutch situations and more difficult positions. ![]() Data points like average damage per round (ADR) and kills per round (KPR) have a star-player bias, as they generally are put in situations where they are more likely than their teammates to find kills, which end up padding their statistics. However, statistical analysis of this kind can be challenged. He's the best statistical player on Astralis in basically every measure we use to determine the best. Using the HLTV rating, he is the highest-performing player on his team on LAN. The sheer volume of kills that dev1ce gets is staggering and unparalleled in his team. The obvious argument for dev1ce is the statistical one. NBA not looking at a new esports league in China.To figure out what makes a player best is to ask how we should measure "bestness." Editor's Picks The aforementioned argument demonstrates a difference in measures of this concept. The term "best" refers to a concept, essentially meaning "the player who contributes most to reaching an objective." In Counter-Strike, the goal is to win tournaments. This suggests a vast difference in what both parties consider to compose the "best" player, and it speaks to the polar-opposite opinions in the never-ending debate. Thorin and lurppis argued for the consensus best player, Nicolai "dev1ce" Reedtz, while GeT_RiGhT argued contentiously for Andreas "Xyp9x" Højsleth, considered the support player of Astralis. On an alternate stream for ESL Pro League, Christopher "GeT_RiGhT" Alesund, Duncan "Thorin" Shields, and Tomi "lurppis" Kovanen had an argument about which player on Astralis was "the best" in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |